Decompositional approach to the choice of appointments for vessels in the calendar planning of river fleet operations

  • Alexander J. Platov Nizhny Novgorod State University of Archi-tecture and Civil Engineering
  • Juri I. Platov Volga State Unuversity of Water Transport, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of choosing the purpose of river cargo vessels in the operational planning and regulation of the fleet. The article substantiates the inapplicability of the previous approaches to calendar planning due to the changed economic relations and organizational capabilities of shipping companies. A two-stage scheme for solving the assignment problem is proposed. The first stage is reduced to the formation of a dynamic basic scheme of the fleet, with the help of which impossible or obviously inefficient options for appointments in the current planning period (decade, month, etc.) are cut off. Using the basic scheme allows you to divide the complex combinatorial task of determining assignments into two simpler ones. At the second stage, the selection of options from the set specified in the basic scheme is carried out on the basis of simulation modeling. The use of the simulation model allows us to take into account all the factors that affect the operation of the fleet, in particular the changing navigation conditions, individual differences between vessels, as well as the dynamic nature of the transport process.

Keywords: river vessels, fleet operation, calendar planning, simulation, combinatorial problem decomposi-tion, basic fleet usage scheme, ship assignment, continuous planning

References

Платов А.Ю. Методы оперативного планирования работы речного грузового флота в современных условиях. Н.Новгород: ВГАВТ, 2009. 155 с.

Linying Chen, Junmin Mou, Han Ligteringen. Simulation of Traffic Capacity of Inland Wa-terway Network. International Workshop on Next Generation Nautical Traffic Models. Delft, The Netherlands. 2013. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324543642_Simulation_of_Traffic_Capacity_of_Inland_Waterway_Network. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18514-30

Fischer N., Treiber M., Söhngen B. Modeling and simulating traffic flow on inland water-ways. PIANC World Congress San Francisco, USA 2014 URL: https://mtreiber.de/publications/FischerTreiberSoehngenPIANC2014.pdf

Kreis D., Sturgill R.E., Howell B.K., Van Dyke C.W., Voss D.S. Waterway Operational Model & Simulation Along the Ohio River. University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/KTC.RR.2014.13.

Gimbel J. H. Waterway Systems Simulation: Volume II—WATSIM: A Waterway Transport Simulator. Report TTSC 7109, Pennsylvania Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 1971, pp. 197.

Hayward J. C. Waterway Systems Simulation: Volume IV— LOKSIM: A Multiple Cham-ber Lock Simulation Model. Report TTSC 7111, Pennsylvania Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 1971. - 93 pp.

Herendeen J.Jr., Staadeker P.J. Waterway Systems Simulation: Volume VI — Application of System Simulation Models. Ohio River Navigation Study. Report TTSC 7113, Pennsylvania Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 1971.

Hinnenthal J., Harries S. A Systematic Study on Posing and Solving the Problem of Pareto Optimal Ship Routing. 3nd Interational Conference on Computre Applications and Information Technology in Maritime Industries (COMPIT 2004). Siguensa, Spain, 2004. P. 27-35.

Rea J.C., Nowading D.C. Waterway Systems Simulation: Volume V—Simulation of Mul-tiple Channel Deep Draft Navigation Systems. Report TTSC 7112, Pennsylvania Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 1971.

Waterway Analysis Model (WAM). User Manual. Shallow Draft Version, NESP Reports. Huntington, West Virginia, 2007.

Ширяев Е.В. К вопросу разработки алгоритма расчёта декадного плана работы фло-та // Труды ГИИВТ. Горький, 1967. Вып. 84. С. 22-32.

Платов Ю.И. Алгоритм выбора назначений судам при оперативном регулировании работы флота // Труды ГИИВТ. Горький, 1983. Вып. 195. С. 3-10.

Бутов А.С., Кока Н.Г. Имитационное моделирование работы флота на ЭВМ. М.: Транспорт, 1987. 111 с.

Рыжов Л. М., Пьяных С.М., Пигалова Н.В. Метод разработки базовой схемы гра-фика движения флота // Труды ГИИВТ. Горький, 1975. Вып. 146. С. 70-75.

Золотов В.В., Иванов В.М. Алгоритм автоматизированного формирования базовой схемы освоения плановых грузопотоков // Труды ГИИВТ, Горький, 1980. Вып. 173, ч. 1. С. 66-71.

Author Biographies

Alexander Y. Platov Platov , Nizhny Novgorod State University of Archi-tecture and Civil Engineering

Dr. Sci. Tech, head of Applied Informatics and Statistic Chair, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Ilyinskaya st., 65, e-mail: platoff@mail.ru

Juri I. Platov , Volga State Unuversity of Water Transport, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Dr. Sci. Tech, professor of Transport Management Chair, Volga State Uni-versity of Water Transport, 603951, Nizhny Novgorod, Nesterova st., 5, e-mail: platov1@yandex.ru

Published
15-06-2021
How to Cite
Platov, A. Y. P., & Platov, J. I. (2021). Decompositional approach to the choice of appointments for vessels in the calendar planning of river fleet operations. Russian Journal of Water Transport, (67), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.37890/jwt.vi67.194
Section
Economics, logistics and transport management