Assessment of the ultimate and residual strength of a ship's hull

  • Sergei A. Ogay Admiral G.I. Nevelskoy Maritime State University, Vladivostok, Russia
  • Le Trong Thinh Admiral G.I. Nevelskoy Maritime State University, Vladivostok, Russia

Abstract

The Common Structural Rules (CSR) developed by the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) stipulate the incremental-iterative method as one of the standard methods for assessing the ultimate/residual strength of an intact or damaged ship's hull. Based on the force equilibrium condition (FEC), the position of the neutral axis (NA) of the cross-section is determined at each increment of curvature. However, in cases of non-uniform loading or damage due to collision/grounding, which lead to asymmetry in the ship's hull cross-section, the NA undergoes both translational and rotational motion simultaneously. To account for the rotational motion of the NA, the force equilibrium condition is extended to a vector equilibrium condition (VEC), and the Sequential Least Squares Quadratic Programming (SLSQP) algorithm is employed to simultaneously determine both motions of the NA. For a container ship under upright, intact condition, the numerical calculation results show good agreement with existing methods, including those outlined in the reports of the International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress (ISSC). The influence of the NA rotation angle on the ultimate/residual strength at various ship heel angles is discussed. Owing to the improved convergence rate and required accuracy of the SLSQP algorithm, the proposed method can be used for a rapid and rational assessment of hull strength under adverse conditions.

Keywords: incremental-iterative method, neutral axis, curvature, residual strength, ultimate strength, SLSQP algorithm

References

Yao T., Astrup C., Carudis P., Chen N., Cho S.-R., Dow R., et al. Ultimate hull girder strength // Proc 14th international ship and offshore structures congress (ISSC). Nagasaki, Japan, 2000. –Vol. 2. – P. 321–391.

URL: http://www.mar.ist.utl.pt/jgordo/Artigos%20Oficiais/3.3.11%20-%20ISSC2000_III.1_Ultimate%20Strenght.pdf. (На англ. яз.).

Caldwell J.B. Ultimate longitudinal strength // Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects. – 1965. – Vol. 107. – P. 411–430. (На англ. яз.).

Paik J.K., Mansour A. A Simple Formulation for Predicting the Ultimate Strength of Ships // Journal of Marine Science and Technology. – 1995. – Vol. 1. – Is. 1. – P. 52–62.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240013. (На англ. яз.).

Paik J.K., Kim D.K., Park D.H., Kim H.B., Mansour A.E., Caldwell J.B. Modified Paik–Mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls // Ships and Offshore Structures. – 2013. – Vol. 8. – Is. 3-4. – P. 245–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2012.676247. (На англ. яз.).

Li C., et al. Application of the incorporated meshing technique to non-linear FE analysis of hull girder ultimate strength // International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016. – Is. OMAE2016-55094, V003T02A098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-55094. (На англ. яз.).

Ueda Y., Rashed S.M.H. The Idealized Structural Unit Method and Its Application to Deep Girder Structures // Computers & Structures. – 1984. – Vol. 18. – Is. 2. – P. 227–293.

– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(84)90126-3. (На англ. яз.).

Paik J.K., Seo J.K., Kim D.M. Idealized structural unit method and its application to progressive hull girder collapse analysis of ships // Ships and Offshore Structures. – 2006. – Vol. 1. – Is. 3. – P. 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1533/saos.2006.0129. (На англ. яз.).

Smith C.S. Influence of Local Compression Failure on Ultimate Longitudinal Strength of Ship Hull // International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding (PRADS). Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 18–20, 1977. – P. 73–79. (На англ. яз.).

Коршунов В.А., Манухин В.А., Родионов А.А. Применение и сравнение различных методов вычисления предельных изгибающих моментов корпуса судна // Морские интеллектуальные технологии. – 2022. – Ч. 2. – № 4. – С. 27–35.

– URL: https://morintex.ru/wp-content/files_mf/1671219577МИТ4ЧАСТЬ220221612испр.pdf.

Paik, J. M., Amlashi, H., Boon, B., Branner, K., Caridis, P., Das, P., Fujikubo, M., Huang, C. H., Josefson, L., Kaeding, P., Kin, C. W., Parmentier, G., Pasqualino, I. P., Rizzo, C. M., Vhanmane, S., Wang, X. Z., and Yang, P. Committee III.1: Ultimate Strength // 18th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress. Rostock, Germany, Sept. 9–13, 2012. – 50 p.

URL: https://issc2025.com/uploads/issc2012-vol1-com-III.1.pdf. (На англ. яз.).

International Association of Classification Societies (IACS). Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers [ed. of 01 Jan. 2024 with corrigenda of 01 July 2025]. – London, UK: IACS, 2024. (На англ. яз.).

Fujikubo M., Alie M.Z.M., Takemura K., Iijima K., Oka S. Residual hull girder strength of asymmetrically damaged ships-influence of rotation of neutral axis due to damages // Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers. – 2012. – Vol. 16. – P. 131–140.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe.16.131. (На англ. яз.).

Choung J., Nam J.-M., Ha T.-B. Assessment of residual ultimate strength of an asymmetrically damaged tanker considering rotational and translational shifts of neutral axis plane // Marine Structures. – 2012. – Vol. 25. – Is. 1. – P. 71–84.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.12.004. (На англ. яз.).

Kraft D. A Software Package for Sequential Quadratic Programming // Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DFVLR), research report DFVLR-FB 88-28, Jul 1988. – 33 p. URL: https://degenerateconic.com/uploads/2018/03/DFVLR_FB_88_28.pdf. (На англ. яз.).

Joshy A. J. A modular development environment and library for optimization algorithms // arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12942. – 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.12942. (На англ. яз.).

Srinath R., et al. Aerofoil optimization using SLSQP and validation using numerical and analytical methods // Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology. – 2024. – Vol. 62. – Is. 6. – P. 1210–1226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/19371. (На англ. яз.).

Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python // Nature methods. – 2020. – Vol. 17. – Is. 3. – P. 261–272. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. (На англ. яз.).

Author Biographies

Sergei A. Ogay , Admiral G.I. Nevelskoy Maritime State University, Vladivostok, Russia

Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Ship Theory and Design, Admiral G.I. Nevelskoy Maritime State University, 50a Verkhneportovaya Street, Vladivostok City, Russian Federation, 690059, email: Ogay@msun.ru

Le Trong Thinh Thinh , Admiral G.I. Nevelskoy Maritime State University, Vladivostok, Russia

Postgraduate Student of the Department of Ship Theory and Design, Admiral G.I. Nevelskoy Maritime State University, 50a Verkhneportovaya Street, Vladivostok City, Russian Federation, 690059, email: letrongthinhdtvta@gmail.com

Published
21-06-2026
How to Cite
Ogay, S. A., & Thinh, L. T. T. (2026). Assessment of the ultimate and residual strength of a ship’s hull. Russian Journal of Water Transport, (87), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.37890/jwt.vi87.697
Section
Shipbuilding, ship repair and ecological safety of the ship