Innovations and labor relations in water transport: on the example of foreign and domestic experience
Abstract
For any economic system, market conditions make it a priority to ensure competitiveness. In this regard, water transport is no exception. Transport peculiarity in general is such that without ensuring its efficient operation, the effective operation of the entire national economy is impossible. In an economic system of any development level, the personnel play the most important role with the effective work determining the production effectiveness and the efficiency of economic activities in general. In this regard, any conditions increasing personnel work efficiency should be implemented in the activities of economic entities as soon as possible. In addition, the regulation of labor activity is the key issue in the international economic community. The most relevant conditions currently include those ensuring optimal restructuring of labor relations in the industry. In Russia and abroad, labor relations structure and organization face changes considering optimized tasks, necessary skills, professional competencies, the system of training and advanced training of employees, their relationship with employers and the number of vacancies. Modern scientific literature focuses more on innovation opportunities assessing. Innovation processes evaluation and relationship to employment and labor issues are not often focused on. The paper considers the relationship between innovation, labor relations and labor organization in water transport using the example of international experience and comparing it with domestic realities and prospects. As a part of the foreign experience analysis, the authors are focused on the effectiveness of the phased implementation of innovative initiatives. The advantages of systems based on the principles of cooperation concerning labor relations are emphasized.
References
[2] Vanelslander, T., Sys, C., Lam, J. S. L., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Acciaro, M., Macario, R., & Giuliano, G. (2019). A serving innovation typology: Mapping port-related innovations. Transport Reviews, 39(5), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144647.2019.1587794
[3] Notteboom, T., & Vitellaro, F. (2019). The impact of innovation on dock labour: Evidence from European ports. Electronic Journal of Management, 3, 1–22.
[4] Arduino, G., Aronietis, R., Crozet, Y., Frouws, K., Ferrari, C.,Guihйry, L., Kapros, S., Kourounioti, I., Laroche, F., Lambrou, M., Lloyd, M., Polydoropoulou, A., Roumboutsos, A., Van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2013). How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation. Journal of Research in Transport Economics, 42(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.002
[5] Бабинцева Елена Ивановна, Шишкина Екатерина Сергеевна. Нововведения в области управления трудовыми отношениями. Электронный научно-практический журнал «Экономика и менеджмент инновационных технологий». https://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2016/12/13171
[6] Ambrosino, D., Caballini, C., & Siri, S. (2013). A mathematical model to evaluate different train loading and stacking policies in a container terminal. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.7
[7] Gharehgozli, A., Roy, D., & De Koster, R. (2016). Sea container terminals: New technologies and OR models. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 18(2), 103–140.
[8] Zhang, S., Ruan, X., Xia, Y., & Feng, X. (2018). Foldable container in empty container repositioning in intermodal transportation network of Belt and Road Initiative: strengths and limitations. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 351–369.
[9] Aydogdu, Y. V., & Aksoy, S. (2015). A study on quantitative benefits of port community systems. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 1–10.
[10] Min, H., Ahn, S.-B., Lee, H.-S., & Park, H. (2017). An integrated terminal operating system for enhancing the efficiency of seaport terminal operators. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(3), 428–450.
[11] Bottalico, A. (2020). Towards a common trajectory of port labour systems in Europe? The case of the port of Antwerp. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(2), 311–321.
[12] Andrea Bottalico, Thierry Vanelslander, Patrick Verhoeven Innovation and labor in the port industry: A comparison between Genoa and Antwerp. March 2022. Journal of Business Logistics 43(2) DOI:10.1111/jbl.12303
[13] Verspagen, B. (2005). Innovation and economic growth. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 487–513). Oxford University Press.
[14] Jenssen, J. (2003). Innovation, capabilities and competitive advantage in Norwegian shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 30, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088 83032 00008 4841
[15] От устойчивости до экологичности. Цифровой двойник помогает порту быть устойчивым, эффективным, экологичным. / ж-л Морские вести России. Морские порты №1 (2022). https://morvesti.ru/analitika/1688/94960/
[16] Michaels, G., Natraj, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2014). Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over twenty-five years. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 60–77.
[17] ТРАНСПОРТ РОССИИ. Информационно-статистический бюллетень. 2023 год. https://mintrans.gov.ru/documents/7/13259
Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Journal of Water Transport

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





